Bridges in Mathematics

Gateway 1
Meets Expectations
Gateway 2
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3
Meets Expectations
Grades
K-5
Report Released
3/31/2016
Publisher
©2015 The Math Learning Center
Review Tool
v1.0
Cover for Bridges in Mathematics
Note on review tool versions

See the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Report Overview

Ratings Snapshot

Performance status for each gateway across available grades
K12345
Gateway 1
Gateway 2
Gateway 3
Key:
Meets Expectations
Partially Meets Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations
NE
Not Eligible
NC
Not Claimed

Overview

The instructional materials reviewed for K-2 meet the expectations for alignment and usability in each grade. The materials spend the majority of the time on the major work of the grade, and the assessments are focused on grade-level standards. Content is aligned to the standards and progresses coherently through the grades. There is also coherence within modules of each grade. The lessons include conceptual understanding, fluency and procedures, and application. There is a balance of these aspects of rigor. The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs) are used to enrich the learning, but the materials do not always attend to the full meaning of each MP and additional teacher assistance is needed in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.  The K-2 materials also meet the criterion for usability which includes the following areas: use and design, planning support for teachers, assessment, differentiation, and technology.

Gateway Ratings Summary

Kindergarten
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
92%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
88%
Gateway 3
Usability
97%
1st Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
92%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
94%
Gateway 3
Usability
97%
2nd Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
92%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
94%
Gateway 3
Usability
97%

Additional Elements

K12
Focus
100%100%100%
Coherence
91%91%91%
Rigor and Balance
100%100%100%
Math Practices
80%89%89%
Teacher Supports
87%87%87%
Student Supports
100%100%100%

Overview

The instructional materials reviewed for grades 3-5 meet the expectations for alignment and usability in each grade. The materials spend the majority of the time on the major work of the grade, and the assessments are focused on grade-level standards. Content is aligned to the standards and progresses coherently through the grades. There is also coherence within modules of each grade. The lessons include conceptual understanding, fluency and procedures, and application. There is a balance of these aspects of rigor. The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs) are used to enrich the learning, but the materials do not always attend to the full meaning of each MP and additional teacher assistance is needed in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.  The 3-5 materials also meet the criterion for usability which includes the following areas: use and design, planning support for teachers, assessment, differentiation, and technology.

Gateway Ratings Summary

3rd Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
85%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
88%
Gateway 3
Usability
97%
4th Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
85%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
88%
Gateway 3
Usability
97%
5th Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
85%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
88%
Gateway 3
Usability
97%

Additional Elements

345
Focus
100%100%100%
Coherence
83%83%83%
Rigor and Balance
100%100%100%
Math Practices
80%80%80%
Teacher Supports
87%87%87%
Student Supports
100%100%100%