Go Math

Note on review tool versions
See the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Report Overview
Overview
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten through Grade 2 partially meet the expectations for alignment to CCSSM. The instructional materials for Grades 1 and 2 meet the expectations for gateway 1 as they appropriately focus on the major work of the grade and demonstrate coherence within the grade and across other grades, but the materials for Kindergarten only partially the expectations from gateway 1. The instructional materials for all grades partially meet the expectations for gateway 2 as they appropriately address rigor within the grade-level standards, but there are missed opportunities in the materials when it comes to attending to the full meaning of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Overall, the instructional materials address the content standards very well and do a nice job of identifying and partially integrating the practice standards.
Gateway Ratings Summary
Kindergarten
1st Grade
2nd Grade
Additional Elements
| K | 1 | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
Focus | |||
Coherence | |||
Rigor and Balance | |||
Math Practices | |||
Teacher Supports | |||
Student Supports |
Overview
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 partially meet the expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. The instructional materials for Grades 3, 4, and 5 meet the expectations for gateway 1 as they appropriately focus on the major work of the grade and demonstrate coherence within the grade and across other grades. The instructional materials in Grades 3, 4, and 5 partially meet the expectations for gateway 2 as they appropriately address rigor within the grade-level standards, but there are missed opportunities in the materials when it comes to attending to the full meaning of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Overall, the instructional materials address the content standards very well and do a nice job of identifying and partially integrating the practice standards.
Gateway Ratings Summary
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
Additional Elements
| 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
Focus | |||
Coherence | |||
Rigor and Balance | |||
Math Practices | |||
Teacher Supports | |||
Student Supports |
Overview
The instructional materials reviewed partially meet expectations for alignment to the Common Core State Standards. For focus, the instructional materials for Grades 6 and 8 meet the criteria for the time devoted to the major work of the grade, but the Grade 7 material does not. For coherence, supporting work is clearly connected to the focus of the grade and is done so in a meaningful way. Coherence is also evident in the instructional materials, including problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain and that connect two or more domains in a grade.
Gateway Ratings Summary
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
Additional Elements
| 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
Focus | |||
Coherence | |||
Rigor and Balance | |||
Math Practices | |||
Teacher Supports | |||
Student Supports |