Math Expressions

Gateway 1
Partially Meets Expectations
Gateway 2
Partially Meets Expectations
Gateway 3
NE
Not Eligible
Grades
K-5
Report Released
2/11/2015
Publisher
©2013 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Review Tool
v1.0
Cover for Math Expressions
Note on review tool versions

See the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Report Overview

Ratings Snapshot

Performance status for each gateway across available grades
K12345
Gateway 1
Gateway 2
Gateway 3
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Key:
Meets Expectations
Partially Meets Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations
NE
Not Eligible
NC
Not Claimed

Overview

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten--Grade 2 do not meet the expectations for alignment and were not reviewed for usability. All grades in this grade band spend the majority of the time on the major work of the grade and align assessments to the standards. These grades also attend to the coherence in the standards. The materials use supporting content as a way to continue work with the major work of the grade. The materials include a full program of study that is viable content for a school year including 150 lesson and assessment days. This set of materials is consistent with the mathematical progression of learning set forth in the standards. All students are given extensive work on grade level problems and this work progresses mathematically. These instructional materials are visibly shaped by the cluster headings in the standards. Connections are made between domains and clusters within the grade level. Kindergarten, Grade 1 and Grade 2 were reviewed for Gateway 2, partially meeting the requirements for the aspects of rigor and the instructional use of the SMP. Overall the K-2  materials do not meet the requirements for alignment and, therefore, were not reviewed for usability.

Gateway Ratings Summary

Kindergarten
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
100%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
61%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
1st Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
92%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
77%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
2nd Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
100%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
66%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE

Additional Elements

K12
Focus
100%100%100%
Coherence
100%91%100%
Rigor and Balance
62%100%75%
Math Practices
60%60%60%
Teacher Supports
NENENE
Student Supports
NENENE

Overview

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3-Grade 5 do not meet the expectations for alignment and usability. All grades spend the majority of the time on major work of the grade but all grades include assessment items that are above grade level standards. The materials in Grade 4 and Grade 5 provide coherence, but the Grade 3 materials do not attend well to the learning progression in fractions, spending much more time on multiplication and division. The materials include a full program of study that is viable content for a school year including 150 days of lessons and assessments. These instructional materials are visibly shaped by the cluster headings in the standards. Connections are made between domains and clusters within the grade level. Overall the Grade 3-Grade 5 band materials do not meet the requirements for alignment and, therefore, were not reviewed for usability.

Gateway Ratings Summary

3rd Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
78%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
66%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
4th Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
92%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
61%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
5th Grade
Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
92%
Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
61%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE

Additional Elements

345
Focus
100%100%100%
Coherence
75%91%91%
Rigor and Balance
75%62%62%
Math Practices
60%60%60%
Teacher Supports
NENENE
Student Supports
NENENE