Reading Street Common Core

Gateway 1
Does Not Meet Expectations
Gateway 2
NE
Not Eligible
Gateway 3
NE
Not Eligible
Grades
K-6
Report Released
4/6/2017
Publisher
©2013 Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)
Review Tool
v1.0
Cover for Reading Street Common Core
Note on review tool versions

See the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Report Overview

Ratings Snapshot

Performance status for each gateway across available grades
K123456
Gateway 1
Gateway 2
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Gateway 3
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Key:
Meets Expectations
Partially Meets Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations
NE
Not Eligible
NC
Not Claimed

Overview

The instructional materials reviewed for Reading Street Kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade 2 do not meet the expectations for alignment. In the critical foundational skills development, materials only partially meet expectations for Kindergarten through Grade 2. The materials do meet the expectations for providing texts worthy of students' time and attention while supporting students' advancement toward independent reading, while grade one does not support this advancement. Kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade 2 do not meet expectations of reading, writing, and speaking to support rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and tasks to build both strong literacy skills as well as content knowledge and vocabulary.  Overall, the instructional materials lack alignment to the CCSS-ELA.

Gateway Ratings Summary

Kindergarten
Gateway 1
Text Quality
44%
Gateway 2
Building Knowledge
NE
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
1st Grade
Gateway 1
Text Quality
41%
Gateway 2
Building Knowledge
NE
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
2nd Grade
Gateway 1
Text Quality
46%
Gateway 2
Building Knowledge
NE
Gateway 3
Usability
NE

Science of Reading Snapshot

K12
Phonemic Awareness
Non-negotiable
50%50%50%
Phonics
Non-negotiable
50%50%50%
Fluency
50%50%50%
Vocabulary
N/AN/AN/A
Comprehension
13%13%16%

Additional Elements

K12
Text Quality and Complexity
41%33%41%
Foundational Skills
50%50%54%
Building Knowledge
NENENE
Teacher Supports
NENENE
Instructional Pathway & Implementation Schedules
NCNCNC
Student Supports
NENENE

Overview

The instructional materials reviewed for Reading Street Grades 3-6 do not meet the expectations for alignment. Grades 3, 4 , and 5 partially meet the expectations of providing texts worthy of students’ time and attention while supporting students’ advancement toward independent reading, but Grade 6 does not. Grade 5 partially meets expectations of reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language supporting foundational reading development and standards alignment, but Grades 3 and 4 do not. Grades 3-6 do not meet expectations of providing opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions about writing about texts to build strong literacy skills. Overall, the instructional materials lack alignment to the CCSS-ELA.

Gateway Ratings Summary

3rd Grade
Gateway 1
Text Complexity and Quality
45%
Gateway 2
Building Knowledge
31%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
4th Grade
Gateway 1
Text Complexity and Quality
45%
Gateway 2
Building Knowledge
25%
Gateway 3
Usability
NE
5th Grade
Gateway 1
Text Complexity and Quality
45%
Gateway 2
Building Knowledge
NE
Gateway 3
Usability
NE

Science of Reading Snapshot

345
Phonemic Awareness
Non-negotiable
N/AN/AN/A
Phonics
Non-negotiable
50%50%50%
Fluency
50%NC50%
Vocabulary
N/AN/AN/A
Comprehension
20%20%16%

Additional Elements

345
Text Quality and Complexity
41%41%41%
Foundational Skills
50%33%50%
Building Knowledge
NENENE
Teacher Supports
NENENE
Instructional Pathway & Implementation Schedules
NCNCNC
Student Supports
NENENE

Overview

The instructional materials reviewed for Reading Street Grades 3-6 do not meet the expectations for alignment. Grades 3, 4 , and 5 partially meet the expectations of providing texts worthy of students’ time and attention while supporting students’ advancement toward independent reading, but Grade 6 does not. Grade 5 partially meets expectations of reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language supporting foundational reading development and standards alignment, but Grades 3 and 4 do not. Grades 3-6 do not meet expectations of providing opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions about writing about texts to build strong literacy skills. Overall, the instructional materials lack alignment to the CCSS-ELA.

Gateway Ratings Summary

6th Grade
Gateway 1
Text Quality
38%
Gateway 2
Building Knowledge
NE
Gateway 3
Usability
NE

Science of Reading Snapshot

6
Phonemic Awareness
Non-negotiable
N/A
Phonics
Non-negotiable
N/A
Fluency
N/A
Vocabulary
N/A
Comprehension
N/A

Additional Elements

6
Text Quality and Complexity
33%
Foundational Skills
NC
Building Knowledge
NE
Teacher Supports
NE
Instructional Pathway & Implementation Schedules
NC
Student Supports
NE